Patent familyBCI, high confidence
Brain-computer interface system and method
Filed by Science Corporation, first in 2024.
- Earliest priority
- 20 Sep 2024 · United States
- Status
- Published applications only; no grant among the members
- Published in
- United States · International (PCT)
- Inventors
- Rostov, Marat · Slager, Nate · Walker, Sage · Hodak, Max · Sharpe, Russell · Zhou, Emma · and 2 more
- Family
- DOCDB 99141629 · 3 publications
What it concerns
Variants of the system can include: a probe and an interface device. Variants of the method can include: configuring a signal pipeline and executing the signal pipeline. In variants, the system and/or method can function to record neural signals from a variety of brain-computer interface (BCI) probe devices. In a specific example, the system and/or method can enable high bandwidth neural recording and processing for BCI experiments.
The abstract as published by the patent office, from US20260083376A1. It describes the invention; it is not a statement of what is protected.
Protection themes
Interface and electrodes
Electrodes and arrays · Optical interfaces
Implant electronics
Chips and on-implant computing
Decoding
Neural decoding
What the filing appears to be about, read by published rules from its title, abstract and classification codes (A61B2562/046, A61B5/0006, A61B5/263, A61B5/293, A61B5/37). The claims define what a patent protects, and they are not read here.
Why it matters
- Interface and electrodes
- Everything downstream works with what the contacts pick up. Their number, size and distance from the neurons set the ceiling on the signal. The problem behind it: more contacts, closer to neurons, that still record after years in tissue that reacts to them.
- Implant electronics
- An implant has room for very little, so functions that fill a rack in the laboratory have to fit on a chip. The problem behind it: fitting channel count, computing and safety functions into a volume and a heat budget the body accepts.
- Decoding
- This is the step that turns brain activity into a command or a word. Its accuracy and speed are what a user experiences. The problem behind it: accuracy that holds over months without frequent recalibration, for more than one user and one task.
Why the layer matters to the field, not a judgement of this filing. A patent family shows that protection was sought. It does not show that the technology was built, is used in a product, or works in people. The whole stack
The family
One invention, published 3 times in 2 offices. Each publication opens in Espacenet.
- United StatesUS20260083376A126 Mar 2026US20260086639A126 Mar 2026
- International (PCT)a route to several countries, not a countryWO2026064733A126 Mar 2026
Timeline
- 20 Sep 2024First filingEarliest priority, at United States. The family is counted in this year.
- 22 Sep 2025ApplicationsFiled at United States, International (PCT).
- 26 Mar 2026First publicationUS20260083376A1, United States.
Dates as the offices published them. Records of lapses, withdrawals and changes of owner have not been read for this family, and whether a patent is in force today is not assessed.
Sources
- Bibliographic data, family members and office records: European Patent Office, Open Patent Services (the DOCDB and INPADOC databases), read 11 Oct 2026.
- The record itself, with its claims and description: US20260083376A1 in Espacenet
- Counted as a BCI patent family: title or abstract names the field; classified G06F3/015 (input arrangements based on nervous-system activity); filed by Science Corporation, an organisation already in the graph; cites a family already accepted. How families are found and judged