TechnologyHow do neural interfaces work?
How we interface with the nervous system
Every neural interface trades access, resolution and invasiveness against each other. This explorer places 32 of them on one map, by what they do and how far they have come, so that an EEG cap, a deep brain stimulator and an intracortical array can be read on the same terms.
BCI is evolving from decoding the nervous system to interacting with it.
- Reading
- Writing
- Closed loop
- Biohybrid
32 interfaces
Read
Bidirectional
Write
Non-invasive
Around the head
On the skin
Minimally invasive
Vessel or skull window
Invasive
Nerve or sense organ
On the cortex
In the cortex
Deep brain
Biohybrid · Adjacent frontier
Living neural tissue outside the body. Not an interface with a person.
Colour · function
- Read
- Write
- Bidirectional
- Biohybrid
Fill · maturity as a clinical modality
- Established
- Human feasibility
- Early human
- Preclinical
- Research frontier
- Adjacent frontier
WriteInvasiveElectrical
Auditory brainstem implants
A small paddle of electrodes laid on the cochlear nucleus of the brainstem carries sound past a missing or severed auditory nerve. It serves people a cochlear implant cannot help, and it is the most often implanted surface stimulator in the central nervous system.
Showing Auditory brainstem implants: Write, Invasive.
- Where it acts
- On the cochlear nucleus, at the surface of the brainstem
- Information flow
- Electrode paddle → cochlear nucleus
How far it has come
- As a clinical modality
- EstablishedAuthorised in the United States since 2000 for deafness from neurofibromatosis type 2; more than 1,000 implanted worldwide.
- As a BCI application
- EstablishedIn clinical use for a small group of patients. It writes sound and reads nothing, and its results are modest beside the cochlear implant's.
- Access
- Invasive. Open surgery at the brainstem, often in the same operation that removes a tumour.
- Mechanism
- Electrical
- Target
- Brainstem
- Signal
- Electrical pulses across a paddle of disc electrodes
Characteristics · write interfaces
- Spatial precisionFew channels that carry distinct pitch
- TargetabilityA small target; placement varies between patients
- CoverageSound awareness for most, open speech for some
- InvasivenessOpen surgery at the brainstem
Each track runs from low to high. A wide bar means the characteristic varies across implementations.
Strengths
- Works where there is no usable cochlea or auditory nerve
- Authorised for one indication since 2000, with long clinical experience
Trade-offs
- Modest speech understanding: about a fifth of open-set sentences in tumour patients, pooled across studies
- Results vary widely, and electrode placement is hard to control
Common applications
- Deafness from neurofibromatosis type 2
- People from 12 months of age whose auditory nerve does not work, under one maker's CE mark in Europe; children in the United States only in studies
Human evidence
A 2024 systematic review pooled 662 recipients with tumours and 267 without: open-set sentence understanding averaged 21.5% in the first group and 53.0% in the second. Most recipients gain awareness of sound and help with lip-reading.
What needs to happen next
Arrays that conform to the brainstem, electrodes that penetrate it and light-based stimulation are in development. Children without an auditory nerve are the group now under study.
- Same site, other direction
- Use cases
- Hear
- Patent activity
- 240 patent families name this interface, most often on stimulation, electrodes and arrays, closed loop. The patent landscape
Descriptions, ranges and maturity levels are editorial analysis, kept qualitative where the literature does not support exact comparison across technologies. Specific devices differ.
All 32 interfaces as a table
| Interface | Function | Access | Mechanism | Target | Clinical modality | BCI application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Read | Non-invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Magnetic | Cortex | Established | Research frontier | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Optical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Research frontier | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Electrical | Muscle / neuromotor | Established | Established | |
| Read | Minimally invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Minimally invasive | Acoustic | Cortex, Deep brain | Early human | Preclinical | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotor | Early human | Early human | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain, Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Magnetic | Cortex | Established | Research frontier | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Research frontier | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Acoustic | Cortex, Deep brain | Early human | Research frontier | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Retina | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cochlea | Established | Established | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Brainstem | Established | Established | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Early human | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Optical, Molecular | Cortex, Deep brain, Retina | Early human | Preclinical | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotor | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex, Deep brain | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex, Spinal cord | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain, Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Electrical, Biological | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Electrical, Optical, Biological | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Biological, Electrical | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Biological, Electrical | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier |
Use-case explorer
Start from what people want to do
Nine human goals. Each one connects the technology, the companies, the research, the studies and the tools behind it, and says plainly what is available today.
Decoding attempted speech or writing into text and voice.
Can someone who cannot speak hold a conversation again?
Research participants with paralysis have used implanted BCIs to produce text and synthesised voice from attempted speech. All such systems remain in early feasibility studies.
Latest milestoneA single surface implant decoded speech and upper-body gestures at the same time in three participants.
- Companies
- NeuralinkSynchronPrecision NeuroscienceParadromicsBlackrock NeurotechBrainGateStairMedNeuroXessNeuCyber NeuroTechABILITY NeurotechJiMEDg.tec medical engineeringArayaCognixion
- Research
- Simultaneous speech and gesture decoding for multimodal communication in paralysisAn Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech NeuroprosthesisAn instantaneous voice-synthesis neuroprosthesisA high-performance speech neuroprosthesisA high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control+10 more
- Clinical
- VOICEConnect-OneBrainGate2BRAVOUNPCortiCom+3 more
- On the calendar
- BCI Meeting 2027
Why do such different devices exist for the same goal? Each trades signal quality against surgical access. Read the dossier