TechnologyHow do neural interfaces work?
How we interface with the nervous system
Every neural interface trades access, resolution and invasiveness against each other. This explorer places 32 of them on one map, by what they do and how far they have come, so that an EEG cap, a deep brain stimulator and an intracortical array can be read on the same terms.
BCI is evolving from decoding the nervous system to interacting with it.
- Reading
- Writing
- Closed loop
- Biohybrid
32 interfaces
The interface map
Read
Bidirectional
Write
Non-invasive
Around the head
On the skin
Minimally invasive
Vessel or skull window
Invasive
Nerve or sense organ
On the cortex
In the cortex
Deep brain
Biohybrid · Adjacent frontier
Living neural tissue outside the body. Not an interface with a person.
Colour · function
- Read
- Write
- Bidirectional
- Biohybrid
Fill · maturity as a clinical modality
- Established
- Human feasibility
- Early human
- Preclinical
- Research frontier
- Adjacent frontier
BiohybridEx vivoBiological + Electrical
Biohybrid neural computing
Living neurons on a chip, connected in closed loop to a simulated or physical environment, used as part of a computing system. A peer-reviewed study in 2022 reported that cultured neurons changed their activity in a simplified game when given structured feedback. Whether that is learning is debated.
Showing Biohybrid neural computing: Biohybrid, Ex vivo.
Biohybrid · Adjacent frontierLiving neural tissue studied outside the body. It is not a brain-computer interface in a person, and nothing here is a treatment.
- Where it acts
- Neurons on a chip, wired to a simulated or robotic environment
- Information flow
- Environment ↔ living neurons
How far it has come
- As a clinical modality
- Adjacent frontierEarly research systems. No demonstrated advantage over conventional computing on any practical task.
- As a BCI application
- Adjacent frontierNot a brain-computer interface: here the tissue is the computer, not the user.
- Access
- Ex vivo
- Mechanism
- Biological, Electrical
- Target
- Cultured neural tissue
- Signal
- Encoded task state in; decoded activity out
Characteristics · biohybrid interfaces
- Input capabilityTask state encoded as stimulation patterns
- Output capabilityActivity decoded into actions
- AdaptabilityReported in simple tasks; interpretation debated
- LongevityWeeks to months
- ReproducibilityFew independent replications
- ScalabilitySmall networks; keeping tissue alive is the bottleneck
- Research maturityEarly
Each track runs from low to high. A wide bar means the characteristic varies across implementations.
Strengths
- A direct test bed for how living networks adapt to feedback
- Gives disease and drug models a functional read-out
Trade-offs
- No demonstrated advantage over conventional computing
- Results depend on fragile, short-lived preparations
Common applications
- Research on learning and adaptation
- Drug and disease models
- Laboratory demonstrations with simple robots
Human evidence
None in people.
What needs to happen next
Independent replication, benchmarks against simple artificial systems, and preparations that stay stable for longer.
- Same site, other direction
Descriptions, ranges and maturity levels are editorial analysis, kept qualitative where the literature does not support exact comparison across technologies. Specific devices differ.
All 32 interfaces as a table
| Interface | Function | Access | Mechanism | Target | Clinical modality | BCI application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Read | Non-invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Magnetic | Cortex | Established | Research frontier | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Optical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Research frontier | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Electrical | Muscle / neuromotor | Established | Established | |
| Read | Minimally invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Minimally invasive | Acoustic | Cortex, Deep brain | Early human | Preclinical | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotor | Early human | Early human | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain, Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Magnetic | Cortex | Established | Research frontier | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Research frontier | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Acoustic | Cortex, Deep brain | Early human | Research frontier | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Retina | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cochlea | Established | Established | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Brainstem | Established | Established | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Early human | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Optical, Molecular | Cortex, Deep brain, Retina | Early human | Preclinical | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotor | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex, Deep brain | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex, Spinal cord | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain, Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Electrical, Biological | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Electrical, Optical, Biological | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Biological, Electrical | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Biological, Electrical | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier |
Use-case explorer
Start from what people want to do
Nine things people want an interface to do. Each links the technology, the companies, the research, the studies and the tools behind it, and says what is available today.
Decoding attempted speech or writing into text and voice.
Can someone who cannot speak hold a conversation again?
Research participants with paralysis have used implanted BCIs to produce text and synthesised voice from attempted speech. All such systems remain in early feasibility studies.
Latest milestoneA single surface implant decoded speech and upper-body gestures at the same time in three participants.
- Companies
- NeuralinkSynchronPrecision NeuroscienceParadromicsBlackrock NeurotechBrainGateStairMedNeuroXessNeuCyber NeuroTechABILITY NeurotechJiMEDg.tec medical engineeringArayaCognixion
- Research
- Simultaneous speech and gesture decoding for multimodal communication in paralysisLong-term independent use of an intracortical brain–computer interface for speech and cursor controlImplanted brain-computer interface functionality during nighttime in late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosisAn Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech NeuroprosthesisAn instantaneous voice-synthesis neuroprosthesis+13 more
- Clinical
- VOICEConnect-OneBrainGate2BRAVOUNPCortiCom+3 more
- On the calendar
- BCI Meeting 2027
Why do such different devices exist for the same goal? Each trades signal quality against surgical access. Read the dossier