Skip to content
The BCI Briefing

TechnologyHow do neural interfaces work?

How we interface with the nervous system

Every neural interface trades access, resolution and invasiveness against each other. This explorer places 32 of them on one map, by what they do and how far they have come, so that an EEG cap, a deep brain stimulator and an intracortical array can be read on the same terms.

32 interfaces

The interface map

Read

Bidirectional

Write

Non-invasive

Around the head

On the skin

Minimally invasive

Vessel or skull window

Invasive

Nerve or sense organ

On the cortex

In the cortex

Deep brain

Biohybrid · Adjacent frontier

Living neural tissue outside the body. Not an interface with a person.

Fig. 01The interface design spaceSelect up to 4 interfaces to compare.

Colour · function

  • Read
  • Write
  • Bidirectional
  • Biohybrid

Fill · maturity as a clinical modality

  • Established
  • Human feasibility
  • Early human
  • Preclinical
  • Research frontier
  • Adjacent frontier
ComparingCochlear · ABI

Compare mode

Two to four, side by side

Select interfaces on the map, or start from a pairing that answers a common question. Only characteristics that apply to every interface chosen are compared.

  • Add from the map

Useful comparisons

Comparison of Cochlear implants, Auditory brainstem implants
Dimension
FunctionWriteInfluence neural activityWriteInfluence neural activity
AccessInvasiveEar surgery, outside the skull.InvasiveOpen surgery at the brainstem, often in the same operation that removes a tumour.
MechanismElectricalElectrical
TargetCochleaBrainstem
Information flowElectrode array → auditory nerveElectrode paddle → cochlear nucleus
Spatial precisionCentimetres → Single neuronsTens of channels, blurred by current spreadFew channels that carry distinct pitch
TargetabilityUnselective → Cell-type specificFrequency regions along the cochleaA small target; placement varies between patients
CoverageOne small site → Whole brainMost of the range used for speechSound awareness for most, open speech for some
InvasivenessNone → Open, penetratingEar surgeryOpen surgery at the brainstem
Maturity as a clinical modalityEstablishedRoutine care for severe hearing loss, for decades.EstablishedAuthorised in the United States since 2000 for deafness from neurofibromatosis type 2; more than 1,000 implanted worldwide.
Maturity as a BCI applicationEstablishedThe reference case for a neural interface in everyday use.EstablishedIn clinical use for a small group of patients. It writes sound and reads nothing, and its results are modest beside the cochlear implant's.
Strengths
  • Decades of evidence and routine clinical pathways
  • Speech understanding for most recipients
  • Works where there is no usable cochlea or auditory nerve
  • Authorised for one indication since 2000, with long clinical experience
Limitations
  • Coarse pitch: music and speech in noise remain hard
  • Outcomes vary widely between people
  • Modest speech understanding: about a fifth of open-set sentences in tumour patients, pooled across studies
  • Results vary widely, and electrode placement is hard to control
Common applications
  • Severe to profound hearing loss
  • Deafness from neurofibromatosis type 2
  • People from 12 months of age whose auditory nerve does not work, under one maker's CE mark in Europe; children in the United States only in studies
Human evidenceExtensive: routine care in children and adults, with long-term outcome data.A 2024 systematic review pooled 662 recipients with tumours and 267 without: open-set sentence understanding averaged 21.5% in the first group and 53.0% in the second. Most recipients gain awareness of sound and help with lip-reading.
What needs to happen nextFiner pitch through more independent channels. Light-based stimulation is one route, and is preclinical.Arrays that conform to the brainstem, electrodes that penetrate it and light-based stimulation are in development. Children without an auditory nerve are the group now under study.
Related researchNone in our corpus yetNone in our corpus yet
Related companies

Bars run from low to high and show a range, not a score. A wide bar means the characteristic varies across implementations. Qualitative editorial ranges; specific devices differ.

Descriptions, ranges and maturity levels are editorial analysis, kept qualitative where the literature does not support exact comparison across technologies. Specific devices differ.

All 32 interfaces as a table
Every interface, with its function, access, mechanism, target and maturity
InterfaceFunctionAccessMechanismTargetClinical modalityBCI application
ReadNon-invasiveElectricalCortexEstablishedHuman feasibility
ReadNon-invasiveMagneticCortexEstablishedResearch frontier
ReadNon-invasiveOpticalCortexHuman feasibilityResearch frontier
ReadNon-invasiveElectricalMuscle / neuromotorEstablishedEstablished
ReadMinimally invasiveElectricalCortexHuman feasibilityHuman feasibility
ReadMinimally invasiveAcousticCortex, Deep brainEarly humanPreclinical
ReadInvasiveElectricalPeripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotorEarly humanEarly human
ReadInvasiveElectricalCortexEstablishedHuman feasibility
ReadInvasiveElectricalCortexHuman feasibilityHuman feasibility
ReadInvasiveElectricalDeep brain, CortexEstablishedEarly human
WriteNon-invasiveMagneticCortexEstablishedResearch frontier
WriteNon-invasiveElectricalCortexHuman feasibilityResearch frontier
WriteNon-invasiveAcousticCortex, Deep brainEarly humanResearch frontier
WriteInvasiveElectricalPeripheral nerveEstablishedEarly human
WriteInvasiveElectricalRetinaHuman feasibilityHuman feasibility
WriteInvasiveElectricalCochleaEstablishedEstablished
WriteInvasiveElectricalBrainstemEstablishedEstablished
WriteInvasiveElectricalCortexEstablishedEarly human
WriteInvasiveElectricalCortexEarly humanEarly human
WriteInvasiveOptical, MolecularCortex, Deep brain, RetinaEarly humanPreclinical
WriteInvasiveElectricalDeep brainEstablishedEarly human
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalPeripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotorEarly humanEarly human
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalCortexEstablishedEarly human
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalCortex, Deep brainEstablishedHuman feasibility
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalCortex, Spinal cordEarly humanEarly human
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalCortexEarly humanEarly human
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalDeep brain, CortexEstablishedEarly human
BidirectionalInvasiveElectricalDeep brainEstablishedHuman feasibility
BiohybridEx vivoElectrical, BiologicalCultured neural tissueAdjacent frontierAdjacent frontier
BiohybridEx vivoElectrical, Optical, BiologicalCultured neural tissueAdjacent frontierAdjacent frontier
BiohybridEx vivoBiological, ElectricalCultured neural tissueAdjacent frontierAdjacent frontier
BiohybridEx vivoBiological, ElectricalCultured neural tissueAdjacent frontierAdjacent frontier

Use-case explorer

Start from what people want to do

Nine things people want an interface to do. Each links the technology, the companies, the research, the studies and the tools behind it, and says what is available today.

Decoding attempted speech or writing into text and voice.

Can someone who cannot speak hold a conversation again?

Research participants with paralysis have used implanted BCIs to produce text and synthesised voice from attempted speech. All such systems remain in early feasibility studies.

Latest milestoneA single surface implant decoded speech and upper-body gestures at the same time in three participants.

On the calendar
BCI Meeting 2027

Why do such different devices exist for the same goal? Each trades signal quality against surgical access. Read the dossier