TechnologyHow do neural interfaces work?
How we interface with the nervous system
Every neural interface trades access, resolution and invasiveness against each other. This explorer places 32 of them on one map, by what they do and how far they have come, so that an EEG cap, a deep brain stimulator and an intracortical array can be read on the same terms.
BCI is evolving from decoding the nervous system to interacting with it.
- Reading
- Writing
- Closed loop
- Biohybrid
32 interfaces
The interface map
Read
Bidirectional
Write
Non-invasive
Around the head
On the skin
Minimally invasive
Vessel or skull window
Invasive
Nerve or sense organ
On the cortex
In the cortex
Deep brain
Biohybrid · Adjacent frontier
Living neural tissue outside the body. Not an interface with a person.
Colour · function
- Read
- Write
- Bidirectional
- Biohybrid
Fill · maturity as a clinical modality
- Established
- Human feasibility
- Early human
- Preclinical
- Research frontier
- Adjacent frontier
Compare mode
Two to four, side by side
Select interfaces on the map, or start from a pairing that answers a common question. Only characteristics that apply to every interface chosen are compared.
- Add from the map
Useful comparisons
| Dimension | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Function | ReadSense neural activity | ReadSense neural activity | ReadSense neural activity |
| Access | InvasiveA conventional grid under the dura is placed through a craniotomy. Epidural implants open the skull too, to the size of the implant, but leave the dura closed; films can be slid under the dura through a slit, and soft grids are being designed to unfold through a burr hole. Some of these systems are classed as minimally invasive in the company profiles. | Invasive | Invasive |
| Mechanism | Electrical | Electrical | Electrical |
| Target | Cortex | Deep brain, Cortex | Cortex |
| Information flow | Cortex → surface grid | Deep structures → depth electrodes | Cortex → penetrating array |
| Spatial resolutionCentimetres → Single neurons | Millimetre to sub-millimetre | Millimetre, sparse | Single neurons |
| Temporal resolutionSeconds → Sub-millisecond | Milliseconds | Milliseconds | Sub-millisecond |
| Signal richnessIndirect or summed → Single-unit detail | Population activity, including high gamma | Field potentials along each shaft | Spikes from individual neurons |
| CoverageOne small site → Whole brain | Several cm² per array | Sparse but deep and distributed | A few mm² per array |
| InvasivenessNone → Open, penetrating | Craniotomy; slit delivery for thin films | Stereotactic burr holes | Craniotomy; penetrating insertion |
| Long-term stabilityVariable → Stable for years | Stable over months to years in studies | Mostly temporary monitoring | Changes over months to years; varies by design |
| Maturity as a clinical modality | EstablishedRoutine in epilepsy surgery for mapping and monitoring. | EstablishedRoutine in planning epilepsy surgery. | Human feasibilityResearch implants in people since 2004. Not a routine clinical tool. |
| Maturity as a BCI application | Human feasibilityResearch implants in several countries. One epidural system is authorised in China for assisted grasp. | Early humanInterface research in monitored patients, during hospital stays of days to weeks. | Human feasibilityFeasibility studies across several groups and companies; the basis of the leading speech results. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
| Limitations |
|
|
|
| Common applications |
|
|
|
| Human evidence | Speech decoded at a median 78 words per minute from a surface grid in one participant (2023), and a 128-channel implant that kept its control across days without recalibration (2021). A 32-participant trial supported the registration of an epidural system in China; its results are unpublished. | Many research studies in people who have the electrodes for clinical reasons. Little chronic interface data. | Two decades of peer-reviewed results, mostly from single participants: handwriting at 90 characters per minute (2021), speech at 62 words per minute (2023), 97.5% word accuracy held over 8.4 months (2024), two-handed typing at up to 110 characters per minute (2026), and more than 3,800 hours of use at home by one participant with no researcher present (2026). |
| What needs to happen next | Fully implanted wireless systems with high channel counts, and trials large enough to support wider authorisation. | Chronic depth-electrode systems designed as interfaces, not borrowed from monitoring. | Longevity data for the newer electrode designs, and a pivotal trial. |
| Related research | None in our corpus yet | ||
| Related companies | None in our corpus yet |
Bars run from low to high and show a range, not a score. A wide bar means the characteristic varies across implementations. Qualitative editorial ranges; specific devices differ.
Descriptions, ranges and maturity levels are editorial analysis, kept qualitative where the literature does not support exact comparison across technologies. Specific devices differ.
All 32 interfaces as a table
| Interface | Function | Access | Mechanism | Target | Clinical modality | BCI application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Read | Non-invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Magnetic | Cortex | Established | Research frontier | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Optical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Research frontier | |
| Read | Non-invasive | Electrical | Muscle / neuromotor | Established | Established | |
| Read | Minimally invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Minimally invasive | Acoustic | Cortex, Deep brain | Early human | Preclinical | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotor | Early human | Early human | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Read | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain, Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Magnetic | Cortex | Established | Research frontier | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Human feasibility | Research frontier | |
| Write | Non-invasive | Acoustic | Cortex, Deep brain | Early human | Research frontier | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Retina | Human feasibility | Human feasibility | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cochlea | Established | Established | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Brainstem | Established | Established | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Early human | Early human | |
| Write | Invasive | Optical, Molecular | Cortex, Deep brain, Retina | Early human | Preclinical | |
| Write | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Peripheral nerve, Muscle / neuromotor | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex, Deep brain | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex, Spinal cord | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Cortex | Early human | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain, Cortex | Established | Early human | |
| Bidirectional | Invasive | Electrical | Deep brain | Established | Human feasibility | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Electrical, Biological | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Electrical, Optical, Biological | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Biological, Electrical | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier | |
| Biohybrid | Ex vivo | Biological, Electrical | Cultured neural tissue | Adjacent frontier | Adjacent frontier |
Use-case explorer
Start from what people want to do
Nine things people want an interface to do. Each links the technology, the companies, the research, the studies and the tools behind it, and says what is available today.
Decoding attempted speech or writing into text and voice.
Can someone who cannot speak hold a conversation again?
Research participants with paralysis have used implanted BCIs to produce text and synthesised voice from attempted speech. All such systems remain in early feasibility studies.
Latest milestoneA single surface implant decoded speech and upper-body gestures at the same time in three participants.
- Companies
- NeuralinkSynchronPrecision NeuroscienceParadromicsBlackrock NeurotechBrainGateStairMedNeuroXessNeuCyber NeuroTechABILITY NeurotechJiMEDg.tec medical engineeringArayaCognixion
- Research
- Simultaneous speech and gesture decoding for multimodal communication in paralysisLong-term independent use of an intracortical brain–computer interface for speech and cursor controlImplanted brain-computer interface functionality during nighttime in late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosisAn Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech NeuroprosthesisAn instantaneous voice-synthesis neuroprosthesis+13 more
- Clinical
- VOICEConnect-OneBrainGate2BRAVOUNPCortiCom+3 more
- On the calendar
- BCI Meeting 2027
Why do such different devices exist for the same goal? Each trades signal quality against surgical access. Read the dossier